HighGravityDataPeabody Energy — Jul 31, 2025 release
Fiscal 2025 second-quarter results · 8-K Item 2.02 · Exhibit 99.1 · 0001064728-25-000111
Showing in the filing
Centurion Mine longwall startup
“February 2026”
Period
FY2026
Measure
Company-defined measure
Source
Prose
All guidance in this release · 47
Centurion Mine longwall startup for FY2026
“February 2026”
Estimated benefit from federal royalty reduc… for FY2025
“$15 to $20 million”
Dividend on common stock
“$0.075 per share”
Seaborne Metallurgical Priced Volume (millio… for FY2025
“4.4”
Seaborne Thermal full-year volume increase for FY2025
“200,000 ton increase”
Seaborne Thermal full-year cost reduction for FY2025
“$3 per ton reduction”
Seaborne Metallurgical full year cost for FY2025
“approximately $118 per ton”
PRB full-year volume increase for FY2025
“5 million tons”
PRB full-year cost decrease for FY2025
“$0.63 per ton”
Centurion Mine planned headcount
“400”
Seaborne Thermal volume for Q3 FY2025
“3.9 million tons, including 2.7 million export tons”
Seaborne Thermal Export Priced Tons and Price for Q3 FY2025
“0.6 million export tons are priced at approximately $82 per ton”
Seaborne Thermal costs for Q3 FY2025
“$45-$50 per ton”
Seaborne Metallurgical volume for Q3 FY2025
“2.2 million tons”
Seaborne Metallurgical pricing (percent of p… for Q3 FY2025
“70 to 75 percent”
Seaborne Metallurgical costs for Q3 FY2025
“$110-$120 per ton”
PRB volume for Q3 FY2025
“23 million tons”
PRB average price for Q3 FY2025
“$13.45 per ton”
PRB costs for Q3 FY2025
“$11.00-$11.50 per ton”
Other U.S. Thermal volume for Q3 FY2025
“3.7 million tons”
Other U.S. Thermal average price for Q3 FY2025
“$51.10 per ton”
Other U.S. Thermal costs for Q3 FY2025
“$45-$49 per ton”
Seaborne Thermal Total Volume (millions of s… for FY2025
“14.6 - 15.2”
Seaborne Thermal Priced Volume (millions of … for FY2025
“11.1”
Seaborne Thermal Priced Volume Pricing per S… for FY2025
“$52.25”
Seaborne Thermal Average Cost per Short Ton for FY2025
“$45.00 - $48.00”
Seaborne Thermal (Export) Total Volume (mill… for FY2025
“9.2 - 9.8”
Seaborne Thermal (Export) Priced Volume (mil… for FY2025
“5.7”
Seaborne Thermal (Export) Priced Volume Pric… for FY2025
“$77.12”
Seaborne Thermal (Domestic) Priced Volume (m… for FY2025
“5.4”
Seaborne Thermal (Domestic) Priced Volume Pr… for FY2025
“$26.00”
Seaborne Metallurgical Total Volume (million… for FY2025
“8.0 - 9.0”
Seaborne Metallurgical Priced Volume Pricing… for FY2025
“$121.00”
Seaborne Metallurgical Average Cost per Shor… for FY2025
“$115.00 - 120.00”
PRB U.S. Thermal Total Volume (millions of s… for FY2025
“80.0 - 84.0”
PRB U.S. Thermal Priced Volume (millions of … for FY2025
“83.0”
PRB U.S. Thermal Priced Volume Pricing per S… for FY2025
“$13.65”
PRB U.S. Thermal Average Cost per Short Ton for FY2025
“$11.50 - $12.00”
Other U.S. Thermal Total Volume (millions of… for FY2025
“13.4 -14.4”
Other U.S. Thermal Priced Volume (millions o… for FY2025
“13.8”
Other U.S. Thermal Priced Volume Pricing per… for FY2025
“$52.20”
Other U.S. Thermal Average Cost per Short Ton for FY2025
“$43.00 - $47.00”
SG&A for FY2025
“$95”
Total Capital Expenditures for FY2025
“$420”
Major Project Capital Expenditures for FY2025
“$280”
Sustaining Capital Expenditures for FY2025
“$140”
ARO Cash Spend for FY2025
“$50”
Exhibit 99.1 · the passage around this item
Exhibit 99.1 Media Release Peabody Reports Results For Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Second Quarter Results Reflect Strong Seaborne and PRB Cost Performance Longwall Start at Centurion Mine Accelerated to February 2026 Favorable Changes to Full-Year Volume and Cost Targets ST. LOUIS, July 31, 2025 – Peabody (NYSE: BTU) today reported net income attributable to common stockholders of $(27.6) million, or $(0.23) per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $199.4 million, or $1.42 per diluted share in the prior year quarter. Peabody had Adjusted EBITDA 1 of $93.3 million in the second quarter of 2025 compared to $309.7 million in the prior year quarter (included $80.8 million of insurance recovery and reflected seaborne benchmark prices that were 32 percent higher for metallurgical coal and 35 percent higher for thermal coal than the current year). According to Peabody President and CEO Jim Grech, “Peabody closed out the first half of the year with strong execution and a resilient performance. Effective cost management in the seaborne platforms allowed us to work through a period of lower pricing, while robust Powder River Basin (PRB) demand demonstrated the benefit of our leading U.S. thermal coal business. In addition to Peabody benefiting from higher U.S. coal demand in the first half based on favorable market fundamentals, newly enacted federal legislation is expected to redu
later in the release …
the item shown at left
other guidance in this release
Text is the filed exhibit, verbatim.