Signed in · PRO
Newmont / Full history

Guidance history, every release

Newmont (NEM) · 8 releases, Oct 23, 2024 to Jul 23, 2026 · rows are metrics, columns are releases
Raised · a change from the previous releaseSame · restated unchanged— · not stated in that releaseEvery value links to its sentence in the filing
MetricOct 23, 2024
FY24 Q3
Feb 20, 2025
FY24 Q4
Apr 23, 2025
FY25 Q1
Jul 24, 2025
FY25 Q2
Oct 23, 2025
FY25 Q3
Feb 19, 2026
FY25 Q4
Apr 23, 2026
FY26 Q1
Jul 23, 2026
FY26 Q2
For FY2030
Panel Cave 1-2 (PC1-2) peak copper production rate—New“between 35 and 55 thousand tonnes of copper per year”——————
Panel Cave 1-2 (PC1-2) peak gold production rate—New“between 275 and 325 thousand ounces of gold per year”——————
PC1-2 peak annual copper productionNew“between 35 and 55 thousand tonnes of copper per year”———————
PC1-2 peak annual gold productionNew“between 275 and 325 thousand ounces of gold per year”———————
PC1-2 peak production—New“between 275 and 325 thousand ounces of gold per year, and between 35 and 55 thousand tonnes of copper per year”——————
For FY2028
Reclamation spend (return to normal levels)—————New“$300 to $400 million”——
Reclamation Spend Normalization——————New“$300 to $400 million”—
Tanami Expansion 2 average annual gold production increase—New“approximately 150,000 to 200,000 ounces per year”——————
For FY2027
Panel Cave 1-2 (PC1-2) copper production—New“more than 700 thousand tonnes of copper”——————
Panel Cave 1-2 (PC1-2) gold production—New“4.0 million ounces of gold”——————
PC1-2 copper production over cave lifeNew“more than 700 thousand tonnes”———————
PC1-2 gold production over cave lifeNew“4.0 million ounces”———————
PC1-2 production over cave life—New“4.0 million ounces of gold and more than 700 thousand tonnes of copper”——————
PC2-3 peak annual copper productionNew“between 40 and 60 thousand tonnes of copper per year”———————
PC2-3 peak annual gold productionNew“between 100 and 150 thousand ounces of gold per year”———————
PC2-3 peak production—New“between 100 and 150 thousand ounces of gold per year, and between 40 and 60 thousand tonnes of copper per year”——————
For FY2026
2026E Attributable Gold Production - Managed Portfolio (Moz)——————New“3,915”—
2026E Attributable Gold Production - Non-Managed Portfolio (Moz)——————New“1,345”—
2026E Total Newmont Attributable Gold Production (Moz)——————New“5,260”—
Adjusted Tax Rate—————New“33%”——
Adjusted Tax Rate (5)———————New“33%”
Adjusted Tax Rate (6)——————New“33%”—
Advanced project spending estimate—————New“approximately $285 million”——
Ahafo North - Attributable Development Capital ($M)—————New“30”Reiterated“30”—
Ahafo North - Attributable Sustaining Capital ($M)—————New“55”Reiterated“55”—
Ahafo North - Consolidated By-Product AISC ($/oz) (2)——————New“1,285”—
Ahafo North - Consolidated By-Product CAS ($/oz)——————New“1,045”—
Ahafo North - Consolidated Production (Koz)——————New“315”—
Ahafo North - Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$1,285”——
Ahafo North - Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz)—————New“$1,045”——
Ahafo North - Gold Production (Koz)—————New“315”——
Ahafo North All-In Sustaining Costs—New“$800 to $900 per ounce”——————
Ahafo North production—New“between 275,000 and 325,000 ounces per year”——————
Ahafo South - Attributable Development Capital ($M)—————New“10”Reiterated“10”—
Ahafo South - Attributable Sustaining Capital ($M)—————New“115”Reiterated“115”—
Ahafo South - Consolidated By-Product AISC ($/oz) (2)——————New“2,160”—
Ahafo South - Consolidated By-Product CAS ($/oz)——————New“1,830”—
Ahafo South - Consolidated Production (Koz)——————New“440”—
Ahafo South - Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$2,160”——
Ahafo South - Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz)—————New“$1,830”——
Ahafo South - Gold Production (Koz)—————New“440”——
Attributable Gold Production (Moz) - Managed Portfolio—————New“3,915”——
Attributable Gold Production (Moz) - Non-Managed Portfolio—————New“1,345”——
Attributable gold production for 2026————New“within the same guidance range provided for 2025, but toward the lower end, due to the planned mine sequence at its managed operations”———
Attributable production for 2026—————New“approximately 5.3 million gold ounces, including over 3.9 million gold ounces from Newmont's managed operations”——
Attributable Production Seasonality H1 2026E—————New“48%”Reiterated“48%”—
Attributable Production Seasonality H2 2026E—————New“52%”Reiterated“52%”—
Boddington - Attributable Sustaining Capital ($M)—————New“225”Reiterated“225”—
Boddington - Consolidated By-Product AISC ($/oz) (2)——————New“1,630”—
Boddington - Consolidated By-Product CAS ($/oz)——————New“1,160”—
Boddington - Consolidated Production (Koz)——————New“580”—
Boddington - Copper 2026E Production (ktonne)—————New“17”——
Boddington - Copper Production (ktonne) - Consolidated——————New“17”—
Boddington - Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$1,630”——
Boddington - Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz)—————New“$1,160”——
Boddington - Gold Production (Koz)—————New“580”——
Boddington Q1 2026 bushfire production impact—————New“approximately 60 thousand ounces”——
Brucejack - Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$2,085”——
Brucejack - Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz)—————New“$1,475”——
Brucejack - Gold Production (Koz)—————New“260”——
Cadia - Attributable Development Capital ($M)—————New“370”Reiterated“370”—
Cadia - Attributable Sustaining Capital ($M)—————New“425”Reiterated“425”—
Cadia - Consolidated By-Product AISC ($/oz) (2)——————New“1,575”—
Cadia - Consolidated By-Product CAS ($/oz)——————New“(180)”—
Cadia - Consolidated Production (Koz)——————New“270”—
Cadia - Copper 2026E Production (ktonne)—————New“65”——
Cadia - Copper Production (ktonne) - Consolidated——————New“65”—
Cadia - Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$1,575”——
Cadia - Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz)—————New“$(180)”——
Cadia - Gold Production (Koz)—————New“270”——
Cadia gold production change—————New“expected to decrease by approximately 30 percent in 2026”——
Capital spending for 2026————New“capital spending in 2026 is anticipated to increase as key projects advance, including the tailings work at Cadia and the potential expansion project at Red Chris, keeping the two-year average largely in line with expectations”———
Capitalized Interest ($M)—————New“$175”——
Cerro Negro - Attributable Development Capital ($M)—————New“120”Reiterated“120”—
Cerro Negro - Attributable Sustaining Capital ($M)—————New“95”Reiterated“95”—
Cerro Negro - Consolidated By-Product AISC ($/oz) (2)——————New“1,960”—
Cerro Negro - Consolidated By-Product CAS ($/oz)——————New“1,430”—
Cerro Negro - Consolidated Production (Koz)——————New“220”—
Cerro Negro - Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$1,960”——
Cerro Negro - Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz)—————New“$1,430”——
Cerro Negro - Gold Production (Koz)—————New“220”——
Copper Production (ktonne)—————New“102”Reiterated“102”Reiterated“102”
Depreciation & Amortization ($M)—————New“$2,815”Reiterated“$2,815”Reiterated“$2,815”
Development Capital——————New“45%”—
Development Capital ($M) - Managed Portfolio—————New“$1,160”Reiterated“$1,160”—
Development Capital ($M) - Non-Managed Portfolio—————New“$240”Reiterated“$240”—
Development Capital % of Full Year———————New“37%”
Development Capital Investment———————New“$1.4 billion”
Development Capital Seasonality H1 2026E—————New“45%”Reiterated“45%”—
Development Capital Seasonality H2 2026E—————New“55%”Reiterated“55%”—
Development capital spend—————New“approximately $1.4 billion”——
Development Capital Spend——————New“$1.4 billion”—
Exploration & Advanced Projects ($M)—————New“$525”Reiterated“$525”Reiterated“$525”
Exploration expense estimate—————New“$240 million dollars”——
Fruta Del Norte (6) - Attributable Production (Koz)——————New“155”—
Fruta Del Norte 2026E Attributable Production (Koz)—————New“155”——
General & Administrative ($M)—————New“$375”Reiterated“$375”Reiterated“$375”
Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz) - Managed Portfolio—————New“$1,650”——
Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz) - Non-Managed Portfolio—————New“$1,775”——
Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz) (2) - Managed Portfolio——————New“$1,650”—
Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz) (2) - Non-Managed Portfolio——————New“$1,775”—
Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz) - Managed Portfolio—————New“$965”——
Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz) - Non-Managed Portfolio—————New“$1,400”——
Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz) (2) - Managed Portfolio——————New“$965”—
Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz) (2) - Non-Managed Portfolio——————New“$1,400”—
Interest Expense ($M) (4)———————New“$175”
Interest Expense ($M) (5)——————New“$175”—
Lead Production (ktonne)———————New“90”
Lihir - Attributable Development Capital ($M)—————New“140”Reiterated“140”—
Lihir - Consolidated By-Product AISC ($/oz) (2)——————New“1,765”—
Lihir - Consolidated By-Product CAS ($/oz)——————New“1,475”—
Lihir - Consolidated Production (Koz)——————New“560”—
Lihir - Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$1,765”——
Lihir - Gold Production (Koz)—————New“560”——
Merian - Attributable Sustaining Capital ($M)—————New“80”——
Merian - Consolidated Production (Koz)—————New“300”——
Merian - Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$1,800”——
Merian - Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz)—————New“$1,480”——
Merian - Gold Production (Koz)—————New“225”——
Merian (3) - Attributable Production (Koz)——————New“225”—
Merian (3) - Attributable Sustaining Capital ($M)——————New“80”—
Merian (3) - Consolidated By-Product AISC ($/oz) (2)——————New“1,800”—
Merian (3) - Consolidated By-Product CAS ($/oz)——————New“1,480”—
Merian (3) - Consolidated Production (Koz)——————New“300”—
Nevada Gold Mines (4) - Attributable Development Capital ($M)——————New“240”—
Nevada Gold Mines (4) - Attributable Sustaining Capital ($M)——————New“290”—
Nevada Gold Mines (4) - Consolidated By-Product AISC ($/oz) (2)——————New“1,775”—
Nevada Gold Mines (4) - Consolidated By-Product CAS ($/oz)——————New“1,400”—
Nevada Gold Mines (4) - Consolidated Production (Koz)——————New“935”—
Nevada Gold Mines (NGM) - Attributable Development Capital ($M)—————New“240”——
Nevada Gold Mines (NGM) - Attributable Sustaining Capital ($M)—————New“290”——
Nevada Gold Mines (NGM) - Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$1,775”——
Nevada Gold Mines (NGM) - Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz)—————New“$1,400”——
Nevada Gold Mines (NGM) - Gold Production (Koz)—————New“935”——
PC2-3 development capital spend by NewmontNew“between $150 to $250 million”———————
Peñasquito - Attributable Sustaining Capital ($M)—————New“100”Reiterated“100”—
Peñasquito - Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$(2,395)”——
Peñasquito - Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz)—————New“$(4,325)”——
Peñasquito - Gold Production (Koz)—————New“185”——
Peñasquito - Lead 2026E Production (ktonne)—————New“90”——
Peñasquito - Silver 2026E Production (Moz)—————New“32”——
Peñasquito - Zinc 2026E Production (ktonne)—————New“220”——
Peñasquito silver production change—————New“expected to increase silver production by more than 10 percent”——
Production——————New“5.3 million attributable gold ounces”—
Production Share of Total Attributable Production——————New“23 percent”—
Pueblo Viejo (5) - Attributable Production (Koz)——————New“255”—
Pueblo Viejo 2026E Attributable Production (Koz)—————New“255”——
Reclamation and Remediation Accretion ($M)—————New“$385”Reiterated“$385”Reiterated“$385”
Reclamation spend—————New“approximately $850 million for the total portfolio and approximately $550 million on the Yanacocha water treatment plants”——
Reclamation Spend - Total Portfolio——————New“approximately $850 million”—
Red Chris - Consolidated By-Product CAS ($/oz)——————New“1,390”—
Red Chris - Consolidated Production (Koz)——————New“35”—
Red Chris - Copper 2026E Production (ktonne)—————New“20”——
Red Chris - Copper Production (ktonne) - Consolidated——————New“20”—
Red Chris - Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$3,625”——
Red Chris - Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz)—————New“$1,390”——
Red Chris - Gold Production (Koz)—————New“35”——
Share repurchase program—New“$3.0 billion total share repurchase programs”——————
Silver Production (Moz)———————New“32”
Sustaining Capital——————New“48%”—
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Managed Portfolio—————New“$1,660”Reiterated“$1,660”—
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Non-Managed Portfolio—————New“$290”Reiterated“$290”—
Sustaining Capital % of Full Year———————New“42%”
Sustaining Capital Investment———————New“$1.95 billion”
Sustaining Capital Seasonality H1 2026E—————New“48%”Reiterated“48%”—
Sustaining Capital Seasonality H2 2026E—————New“52%”Reiterated“52%”—
Sustaining capital spend—————New“approximately $1.95 billion”——
Sustaining Capital Spend——————New“$1.95 billion”—
Tanami - Attributable Development Capital ($M)—————New“330”Reiterated“330”—
Tanami - Attributable Sustaining Capital ($M)—————New“270”Reiterated“270”—
Tanami - Consolidated By-Product AISC ($/oz) (2)——————New“2,145”—
Tanami - Consolidated By-Product CAS ($/oz)——————New“1,250”—
Tanami - Consolidated Production (Koz)——————New“365”—
Tanami - Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$2,145”——
Tanami - Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz)—————New“$1,250”——
Tanami - Gold Production (Koz)—————New“365”——
Total Attributable Gold Production———————New“broadly in line with second quarter production”
Total Newmont Attributable Gold Production (koz)———————New“5,260”
Total Newmont Attributable Gold Production (Moz)—————New“5,260”——
Total Newmont Development Capital ($M)—————New“$1,400”Reiterated“$1,400”Reiterated“$1,400”
Total Newmont Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$1,680”——
Total Newmont Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz) (2)——————New“$1,680”Reiterated“$1,680”
Total Newmont Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz)—————New“$1,055”——
Total Newmont Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz) (2)——————New“$1,055”Reiterated“$1,055”
Total Newmont Sustaining Capital ($M)—————New“$1,950”—Reiterated“$1,950”
Total Newmont Sustaining Capital (3)(4)——————New“$1,950”—
Yanacocha - Attributable Sustaining Capital ($M)—————New“10”Reiterated“10”—
Yanacocha - Consolidated By-Product AISC ($/oz) (2)——————New“1,170”—
Yanacocha - Consolidated By-Product CAS ($/oz)——————New“1,070”—
Yanacocha - Consolidated Production (Koz)——————New“460”—
Yanacocha - Gold By-Product AISC ($/oz)—————New“$1,170”——
Yanacocha - Gold By-Product CAS ($/oz)—————New“$1,070”——
Yanacocha - Gold Production (Koz)—————New“460”——
Yanacocha water treatment plant spend————New“anticipates spend on the Yanacocha water treatment plants to be similar in 2026 before beginning to decline in 2027 when the project is expected to be completed”———
Yanacocha Water Treatment Plant Spend——————New“approximately $550 million”—
Zinc Production (ktonne)———————New“220”
For FY2025
Adjusted Tax Rate————New“33%”———
Adjusted Tax Rate h,i——New“34%”Reiterated“34%”————
Advanced project spending—New“approximately $250 million”——————
After tax cash proceeds from divestiture program———New“more than $3.0 billion”————
Attributable Gold Production (Koz) - Total Core Portfolio————New“1,415”———
Attributable Gold Production (Moz) - Managed Core Portfolio———New“4.2”————
Attributable Gold Production (Moz) - Managed Tier 1 Portfolio—New“4.2”Reiterated“4.2”—————
Attributable Gold Production (Moz) - Non-Core Assets—New“0.3”——Reiterated“0.3”———
Attributable Gold Production (Moz) - Non-Core Assets c——New“0.3”Reiterated“0.3”————
Attributable Gold Production (Moz) - Non-Managed Core Portfolio b———New“1.4”————
Attributable Gold Production (Moz) - Non-Managed Tier 1 Portfolio—New“1.4”——————
Attributable Gold Production (Moz) - Non-Managed Tier 1 Portfolio b——New“1.4”—————
Attributable Gold Production (Moz) - Total Core Portfolio———New“5.6”Reiterated“5.6”———
Attributable Gold Production (Moz) - Total Tier 1 Portfolio—New“5.6”Reiterated“5.6”—————
Attributable gold production for the Total Tier 1 Portfolio weighted to first half of the year—New“approximately 48 percent”——————
Attributable production for 2025—New“approximately 5.9 million gold ounces”——————
Attributable Production seasonality—New“48%”——————
Attributable Production seasonality (Total Core Portfolio)———New“50%”————
Attributable Production Seasonality (Total Tier 1 Portfolio)——New“48%”—————
Cash expected to be delivered from non-core asset and other investment sales—New“up to $2.5 billion”——————
Consolidated adjusted effective tax rate related to continuing operations—New“34%”——Lowered“33%”———
Copper AISC ($/tonne) **—New“$8,510”——————
Copper CAS ($/tonne) **—New“$5,160”——————
Copper Production (ktonne)—New“118”——————
Cost escalation impact on unit costs—New“approximately 3 percent”——————
Depreciation & Amortization ($M)————New“$2,600”———
Depreciation & Amortization ($M)————New“$750”———
Depreciation & Amortization ($M) a—New“$2,600”——————
Depreciation & Amortization ($M) f——New“$2,600”Reiterated“$2,600”————
Development Capital——New“57%”Lowered“49%”————
Development Capital ($M) - Managed Core Portfolio———New“$1,140”————
Development Capital ($M) - Managed Tier 1 Portfolio——New“$1,140”—————
Development Capital ($M) - Managed Tier 1 Portfolio—New“1,140”——————
Development Capital ($M) - Non-Core Assets————New“$30”———
Development Capital ($M) - Non-Core Assets c——New“$30”Reiterated“$30”————
Development Capital ($M) - Non-Core Assets*—New“30”——————
Development Capital ($M) - Non-Managed Core Portfolio b———New“$160”————
Development Capital ($M) - Non-Managed Tier 1 Portfolio—New“160”——————
Development Capital ($M) - Non-Managed Tier 1 Portfolio b——New“$160”—————
Development Capital ($M) - Total Core Portfolio———New“$1,300”Lowered“$1,250”———
Development Capital ($M) - Total Core Portfolio————New“$350”———
Development Capital ($M) - Total Tier 1 Portfolio——New“$1,300”—————
Development Capital ($M) - Total Tier 1 Portfolio—New“1,300”——————
Development Capital seasonality—New“57%”——————
Development Capital seasonality (Total Core Portfolio)———New“49%”————
Development Capital Seasonality (Total Tier 1 Portfolio)——New“57%”—————
Development capital spend for the Total Tier 1 Portfolio—New“approximately $1.3 billion”——————
Dividend declared for the fourth quarter of 2025, payable March 26, 2026—————New“$0.26 per share”——
Exploration & Advanced Projects ($M)——New“$525”Reiterated“$525”Lowered“$450”———
Exploration & Advanced Projects ($M)————New“$150”———
Exploration expense—New“$275 million”——————
General & Administrative ($M)—New“$475”Reiterated“$475”Reiterated“$475”Lowered“$390”———
General & Administrative ($M)————New“$100”———
General and administrative costs—New“$475 million”——————
Gold AISC ($/oz) ** - Managed Tier 1 Portfolio—New“1,630”——————
Gold AISC ($/oz) ** - Non-Core Assets *—New“1,830”——————
Gold AISC ($/oz) ** - Non-Managed Tier 1 Portfolio—New“1,555”——————
Gold AISC ($/oz) ** - Total Tier 1 Portfolio—New“1,620”——————
Gold AISC ($/oz) d - Managed Tier 1 Portfolio——New“$1,630”—————
Gold AISC ($/oz) d - Non-Core Assets c——New“$1,830”—————
Gold AISC ($/oz) d - Non-Managed Tier 1 Portfolio b——New“$1,555”—————
Gold AISC ($/oz) d - Total Tier 1 Portfolio——New“$1,620”—————
Gold AISC (Total Portfolio)—New“$1,630 per ounce”——————
Gold AISC from the Total Tier 1 Portfolio—New“$1,620 per ounce”——————
Gold CAS ($/oz) ** - Managed Tier 1 Portfolio—New“1,170”——————
Gold CAS ($/oz) ** - Non-Core Assets *—New“1,450”——————
Gold CAS ($/oz) ** - Non-Managed Tier 1 Portfolio—New“1,240”——————
Gold CAS ($/oz) ** - Total Tier 1 Portfolio—New“1,180”——————
Gold CAS ($/oz) d - Managed Tier 1 Portfolio——New“$1,170”—————
Gold CAS ($/oz) d - Non-Core Assets——New“$1,450”—————
Gold CAS ($/oz) d - Non-Managed Tier 1 Portfolio b——New“$1,240”—————
Gold CAS ($/oz) d - Total Tier 1 Portfolio——New“$1,180”—————
Gold Co-Product AISC ($/oz) - Non-Core Assets————New“$1,830”———
Gold Co-Product AISC ($/oz) - Total Core Portfolio————New“$1,620”———
Gold Co-Product AISC ($/oz) - Total Core Portfolio————New“$1,670”———
Gold Co-Product AISC ($/oz) d - Managed Core Portfolio———New“$1,630”————
Gold Co-Product AISC ($/oz) d - Non-Core Assets c———New“$1,830”————
Gold Co-Product AISC ($/oz) d - Non-Managed Core Portfolio b———New“$1,555”————
Gold Co-Product AISC ($/oz) d - Total Core Portfolio———New“$1,620”————
Gold Co-Product CAS ($/oz) - Non-Core Assets————New“$1,450”———
Gold Co-Product CAS ($/oz) - Total Core Portfolio————New“$1,180”———
Gold Co-Product CAS ($/oz) - Total Core Portfolio————New“$1,260”———
Gold Co-Product CAS ($/oz) d - Managed Core Portfolio———New“$1,170”————
Gold Co-Product CAS ($/oz) d - Non-Core Assets———New“$1,450”————
Gold Co-Product CAS ($/oz) d - Non-Managed Core Portfolio b———New“$1,240”————
Gold Co-Product CAS ($/oz) d - Total Core Portfolio———New“$1,180”————
Gold ounces for the Total Tier 1 Portfolio—New“5.6 million gold ounces”——————
Gold ounces from non-core assets held for sale—New“0.3 million gold ounces”——————
Interest Expense ($M)—New“$300”Reiterated“$300”Reiterated“$300”Lowered“$255”———
Interest Expense ($M)————New“$55”———
Investment in exploration and advanced projects—New“approximately $525 million”——————
Lead AISC ($/tonne) **—New“$1,290”——————
Lead CAS ($/tonne) **—New“$1,080”——————
Lead Production (ktonne)—New“90”——————
Proceeds from the sale of the Akyem operation—New“Up to $1.0 billion”——————
Proceeds from the sale of the CC&V operation—New“Up to $275 million”——————
Proceeds from the sale of the Éléonore operation—New“$795 million”——————
Proceeds from the sale of the Musselwhite operation—New“Up to $850 million”——————
Proceeds from the sale of the Porcupine operation—New“Up to $425 million”——————
Quarterly Dividend Declared——New“$0.25”—————
Reaffirmation——New“remains on track to meet its previously published 2025 guidance”—————
Reclamation and Remediation Accretion ($M)————New“$350”———
Reclamation and Remediation Accretion ($M)————New“$110”———
Reclamation and Remediation Accretion ($M) b—New“$475”——————
Reclamation and Remediation Accretion ($M) g——New“$475”Reiterated“$475”————
Reclamation spend————New“$800 million”———
Reclamation spend——New“$800 million”Reiterated“$800 million”————
Silver AISC ($/oz) **—New“$15.00”——————
Silver CAS ($/oz) **—New“$11.50”——————
Silver Production (Moz)—New“28”——————
Sustaining Capital——New“52%”Lowered“43%”————
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Managed Core Portfolio———New“$1,530”————
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Managed Tier 1 Portfolio——New“$1,530”—————
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Managed Tier 1 Portfolio—New“1,530”——————
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Non-Core Assets————New“$75”———
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Non-Core Assets c——New“$75”Reiterated“$75”————
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Non-Core Assets*—New“75”——————
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Non-Managed Core Portfolio b———New“$270”————
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Non-Managed Tier 1 Portfolio—New“270”——————
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Non-Managed Tier 1 Portfolio b——New“$270”—————
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Total Core Portfolio———New“$1,800”Lowered“$1,650”———
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Total Core Portfolio————New“$450”———
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Total Tier 1 Portfolio——New“$1,800”—————
Sustaining Capital ($M) - Total Tier 1 Portfolio—New“1,800”——————
Sustaining Capital seasonality—New“52%”——————
Sustaining Capital seasonality (Total Core Portfolio)———New“43%”————
Sustaining capital spend for the Total Tier 1 Portfolio—New“approximately $1.8 billion”——————
Tier 1 Portfolio Production Share——New“24 percent”—————
Total Newmont Attributable Gold Production (Moz)—New“5.9”Reiterated“5.9”Reiterated“5.9”Reiterated“5.9”———
Total Newmont Development Capital ($M)——New“$1,330”Reiterated“$1,330”Lowered“$1,280”———
Total Newmont Development Capital ($M)—New“1,330”——————
Total Newmont Gold AISC ($/oz)————New“$1,630”———
Total Newmont Gold AISC ($/oz)————New“$1,670”———
Total Newmont Gold AISC ($/oz) **—New“1,630”——————
Total Newmont Gold AISC ($/oz) d——New“$1,630”Reiterated“$1,630”————
Total Newmont Gold CAS ($/oz)————New“$1,200”———
Total Newmont Gold CAS ($/oz)————New“$1,260”———
Total Newmont Gold CAS ($/oz) **—New“1,200”——————
Total Newmont Gold CAS ($/oz) d——New“$1,200”Reiterated“$1,200”————
Total Newmont Sustaining Capital ($M)——New“$1,875”Reiterated“$1,875”Lowered“$1,725”———
Total Newmont Sustaining Capital ($M)—New“1,875”——————
Total Tier 1 Portfolio production in first quarter—New“23 percent”——————
Yanacocha Water Treatment Plant Reclamation Spend——New“$600 million”—————
Yanacocha water treatment plant spend (part of reclamation spend)————New“up to $600 million”———
Yanacocha water treatment plants spend (full year, part of reclamation)———New“$600 million”————
Zinc AISC ($/tonne) **—New“$1,890”——————
Zinc CAS ($/tonne) **—New“$1,430”——————
Zinc Production (ktonne)—New“236”——————
For FY2024
Adjusted Tax RateNew“34%”———————
All-In Sustaining Cost (AISC)New“$1,475 per ounce”———————
Attributable gold productionNew“1.8 million gold ounces”———————
Attributable Gold Production (Koz)New“1,800”———————
Copper AISC ($/tonne)New“$7,500”———————
Copper CAS ($/tonne)New“$4,900”———————
Copper price assumptionNew“$8,818/tonne”———————
Copper Production (ktonne)New“35”———————
Depreciation & Amortization ($M)New“$700”———————
Development Capital ($M)New“$320”———————
Dividend—New“$0.25 per share of common stock”——————
Exploration & Advanced Projects ($M)New“$115”———————
General & Administrative ($M)New“$110”———————
Gold AISC ($/oz)New“$1,475”———————
Gold CAS ($/oz)New“$1,050”———————
Gold price assumptionNew“$2,500/oz”———————
Interest Expense ($M)New“$80”———————
Lead AISC ($/tonne)New“$1,500”———————
Lead CAS ($/tonne)New“$970”———————
Lead price assumptionNew“$2,094/tonne”———————
Lead Production (ktonne)New“28”———————
PC2-3 copper production over cave lifeNew“more than 400 thousand tonnes”———————
PC2-3 gold production over cave lifeNew“1.0 million ounces”———————
PC2-3 production over cave life—New“1.0 million ounces of gold and more than 400 thousand tonnes of copper”——————
Reclamation spendNew“an additional $225 million”———————
Silver AISC ($/oz)New“$15.00”———————
Silver CAS ($/oz)New“$9.00”———————
Silver price assumptionNew“$28.00/oz”———————
Silver Production (Moz)New“11”———————
Sustaining Capital ($M)New“$550”———————
Zinc AISC ($/tonne)New“$2,100”———————
Zinc CAS ($/tonne)New“$1,200”———————
Zinc price assumptionNew“$2,646/tonne”———————
Zinc Production (ktonne)New“70”———————
No period stated
Additional Share Repurchase Authorization——————New“$6.0 billion”—
Additional share repurchase program authorized by Board———New“$3.0 billion”————
Ahafo North total capital costs—New“between $950 and $1,050 million”——————
Cadia Panel Caves copper reserves to be extractedNew“1.3 million tonnes”———————
Cadia Panel Caves gold reserves to be extractedNew“approximately 5.9 million ounces”———————
Coffee Project sale gross proceeds————New“up to $150 million”———
Ghana Operations Gold AISC Impact——————New“approximately $185 per ounce”—
Gold AISC for the Total Portfolio—New“$1,630 per ounce”——————
Gold CAS for Total Tier 1 Portfolio—New“$1,180 per ounce”——————
Gross divestiture proceedsNew“at least $2 billion”———————
Indicated Total Annualized Dividend—————New“$1.04 per share”Reiterated“$1.04 per share”—
Indicated Total Annualized Dividend per Share———————New“$1.04 per share”
Interest expense—New“approximately $300 million”——————
Longer-term production outlook—————New“approximately 6 million ounces of gold and 150 thousand tonnes of copper annually”——
Minimum Cash Balance———————New“$5 billion”
Minimum Cash Balance Target——————New“$5 billion”—
Minimum cash balance through the cycle—————New“$5 billion”——
Net Cash Target——————New“$1 billion”—
Net Cash Target Flexibility——————New“plus or minus $2 billion”—
PC2-3 development capital spend by Newmont—New“between $150 to $250 million”——————
PC2-3 total capital costNew“between $1.0 and $1.2 billion”———————
PC2-3 total capital costs—New“between $1.0 and $1.2 billion”——————
Reclamation and remediation expense—New“$475 million”——————
Remaining share repurchase authorization————New“$2.7 billion”Widened“$2.4 billion remains under the previously authorized programs of $6.0 billion”——
Share Repurchase Authorization———————New“$6.0 billion”
Share Repurchase Program AuthorizationNew“$2 billion”—Reiterated“$2.0 billion”—————
Sustainable Cash Dividend———————New“$1.1 billion per year”
Sustainable Through the Cycle Cash Dividend—————New“$1.1 billion per year”——
Sustainable Through the Cycle Cash Dividend Target——————New“$1.1 billion per year”—
Tanami Expansion 2 total capital costs—New“between $1.7 and $1.8 billion”——————
Total estimated spend on Yanacocha water treatment plants—————New“approximately $1.8 billion”——
Total Estimated Yanacocha Water Treatment Plant Spend——————New“approximately $1.8 billion”—
Total gross proceeds from announced divestiture transactions———New“up to $4.3 billion”————
Total Gross Proceeds from Divestiture Program——New“up to $4.3 billion”—————
Total Newmont Gold AISC Impact from Ghana Changes——————New“approximately $25 per ounce”—
Total proceeds from announced divestiture transactions————New“up to $4.9 billion”———
Total proceeds from non-core asset and other investment sales—New“up to $4.3 billion”——————
Values in quotation marks are the company’s words. Change labels compare each statement with the same metric and target year in the previous release. HighGravityData does not judge whether guidance was met.